Course ratings draw from completed learner evaluations

Course comparisons in the catalog now use star ratings drawn from completed learner evaluations about course content. For Nevada real-estate professionals reviewing approved course options, the rating shown is tied to feedback from learners who completed an evaluation.

Courses without enough applicable evaluation feedback do not show a rating. That keeps the catalog from presenting an unrated course as though it already has established learner feedback, while still letting rated courses carry a visible signal from completed evaluations.

Ratings tied to the right feedback

The course catalog and instructor-facing statistics now use learner evaluation feedback in more specific ways.

In the catalog, ratings reflect feedback about course content. In instructor-facing student statistics, overall and per-course rating summaries reflect completed learner feedback about instructor knowledge. Related evaluation percentages are calculated from that same response set.

For instructors reviewing student statistics, the view of course performance is more consistent across completions, evaluation submissions, average ratings, and recent enrollment activity. The same completed feedback set supports the rating summaries and the related evaluation percentages, so the numbers are easier to read together without mixing separate signals.

This update keeps ratings closer to the evaluation answers they are meant to represent: course-content feedback for course discovery, and instructor-knowledge feedback for instructor review.